Marine link
 

BP Calls For New Controls on Bunker Fuels

Marine fuel standards need to be reassessed to avoid a significant mismatch between the quality described by the fuel specifications that are demanded by the industry, claims BP Marine.

BP Marine is calling for firmer controls on the practice of adding used lubricating oil to marine fuel oil. It is apparent that there are still ongoing concerns and suspicions about the effects of used lubricants at low levels even though these concerns are not yet documented or substantiated. After the Kalamos legal case in the U.S., the question of acceptability of ULO (used lubricating oil) has become even more confused. Some interpreting the judgment as implying that ULO at levels up to 5 percent is a technically acceptable lift which does not interfere with the stipulations of ISO 8217. In response, an increasing number of users are buying fuels against "no ULO" clauses, even though this can be difficult to manage in a global industry. BP Marine is therefore calling for an industry-wide agreement on the practice. "We believe that the only option to improve the clarity of the situation is to insert a specific limit for the ULO fingerprint elements into the specification tables in the ISO-8217. The intention would be to limit the ULO inclusion to low-level where there is wide agreement that no problems will be encountered while avoiding needles concerns when very low-levels of some fingerprint elements are detected," said Dr. John Liddy, BP Marine's technical manager.

One practical problem with restricting ULO within the present ISO and CIMAC guidelines arises from ULO's varying compositions and potential confusion with trace elements in crude oil. It has become very difficult for fuel buyers to manage this issue effectively and there is a real risk that fuel suppliers and users will inadvertently be driven towards making unrealistic standards and expectations. "Even when marine engine design is more tolerant of "poorer" quality fuel, there are nevertheless, limitations that must be recognized and respected," says Dr. Liddy. "Our challenge to our own industry is to protect fuel buyers against the introduction of unwanted contaminants or unacceptable quality standards and we firmly believe that the industry needs to move forward collectively on this issue."




Maritime Standards History

AMBAR Introduces Bollinger-Built RIB Line lo U.S.
ASTM Committee Discusses Future Marine Technology
BP Calls For New Controls on Bunker Fuels
Electronic Monitoring Will Lead The Way
First Of lew Azimuth Sferndrive Tug Series Adulis — Completes Sea Trials
International Standards for ECDIS: Current Status
KMY Floats Out Njord Field FSU
Meyer Werft Delivers Cruise Vessel Oriana
MTU's Fast F e r r y Engines U n d e r g o M e t a m o r p h e s is
NASSCO To Participate In NSRP Standards Program
Natural Resource Damage Assessment
New directions, expanded growth ahead
New Products For Handling Hazardous Cargo
Northeast Technical Debuts New Tanker Cargo Tank Inspection Device
OSI: Helping To Chart The Future Of Navigation
Raytheon To Purchase Assets Of Standard Radio
Refrasil: High-Temperature Stability Welding Cloth
RGF Filtration System Granted USCG Approval
Rydex Wins Contracts From Trio Of U.S. Shipowners
Standards, Statutes and States: The Issues Facing Our Nation's Tugboat, Towboat and Barge Industry
Total Quality: Companies Near And Far Jump On The ISO Bandwagon
TS Tanksystem SA
U.S.C.G. To Strengthen Enforcement Of Cruise Ship Safety Standards
Unique Process Creates Anti-Slip Floor
USCG: Standing Watch Over The Cruise Industry
Victaulic Honored By ASTM Committee
Vulkan Built Cruise Ship Leaves Dock For Bremerhaven
Why Should The Words "Substantial Alteration" Or "Major Modification" Scare Vessel Owners
World's First Natural Gas-Powered Passenger Ferry Scheduled For Spring 1993 Delivery
ZF Introduces New Reverse/Reduction Gear To North American Market
 
rss feeds | archive | privacy | history | articles | contributors | top news | contact us | about us | copyright