Harbor Mud An Environmental 'Sleeping Giant'

Friday, November 12, 1999
Mud dredged from the bottom of harbors to keep ship commerce flowing is loaded with contaminants like dioxin and mercury, creating a sleeping giant of an environmental mess in America's oceans and waterways, water protection groups said. Scientists and environmentalists demanded that better government protections be employed to protect human health, fish and ecosystems from toxic harbor mud, and called for an immediate ban on the dumping of contaminated sediments. Every year 100 ocean dump sites receive 60 million tons of dredged harbor mud, equivalent to six million dump trucks of mud. Another 400 million tons of sediments are dumped into rivers, lakes, bays and estuaries, according to Clean Ocean Action and Coast Alliance interest groups. "The most dangerous offenders of the industrial age have wound up in the mud below, yet the Environmental Protection Agency and Army Corps of Engineers persist in dumping untreated sediments into America's oceans and rivers," said Beth Millemann, an advocate from Clean Ocean Action. Groups said the EPA has evidence contaminated sediments caused tumors, cancers and skin lesions in fish that came into contact with polluted mud in Elizabeth River, Virginia, San Francisco Bay, Boston Harbor, the Great Lakes and other waters. Women who ate fish contaminated with dangerous PCBs from the bottom mud in the Great Lakes have given birth to babies with smaller heads and weight deficiencies, the groups said. "As long as EPA fails to issue protective criteria, people and wildlife will continue to eat fish contaminated with toxics from sediments, making chemical exposure and health effects a fact of life," said Jackie Savitz, executive director of Coast Alliance. The EPA estimates that more one billion tons of contaminated sediments lie below waterways, and every major harbor suffers from polluted mud. Still, the groups said the EPA has not tightened rules to prevent more pollution in the water. An official with the agency said the EPA puts ocean protection at the top of its priority list when weighing waterway policy. "Protecting the ocean and costal environment is an EPA priority. When making decisions about ocean placement of dredged material EPA uses the best available science," said J. Charles Fox, assistant administrator for water at EPA. "The real solution to dredge material management however, is stopping sediment pollution at its source, whether it be industrial pollution, storm water runoff, sewer overflows or other sources. That is the direction this agency is moving." - (Patrick Connole, Reuters)
Maritime Reporter March 2014 Digital Edition
FREE Maritime Reporter Subscription
Latest Maritime News    rss feeds

Legal

Korean Ferry Captain's Detention Could Extend As Death Toll Mounts

South Korean prosecutors investigating a ferry disaster said on Sunday they would seek to extend the detention of the ship's captain and two other crew by 10

Reports: Brazilian Tycoon Batista Investigated For Financial Crimes

Brazils federal police have opened an investigation into former billionaire Eike Batista for financial crimes, including insider trading, manipulation of markets and money laundering,

Shell Commited To Russia Expansion Despite Sanctions

Royal Dutch Shell is committed to expansion in Russia, Chief Executive Ben van Beurden told Russian President Vladimir Putin at a meeting on Friday amid sanctions

 
 
Maritime Careers / Shipboard Positions Maritime Security Maritime Standards Naval Architecture Navigation Pod Propulsion Port Authority Salvage Ship Electronics Shipbuilding / Vessel Construction
rss | archive | history | articles | privacy | contributors | top maritime news | about us | copyright | maritime magazines
maritime security news | shipbuilding news | maritime industry | shipping news | maritime reporting | workboats news | ship design | maritime business

Time taken: 0.1095 sec (9 req/sec)