Dock Expansion at Oil Refinery Requires EIS

Wednesday, March 17, 2004
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers must prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) with regard to a proposal for a doubling of the dock space at an oil refinery on Puget Sound. The refinery had one dock that it utilized for both offloading crude oil from tankers and loading refined product. The refinery sought a permit from the Corps to build a second dock so that the two functions could be performed separately, reducing congestion and wait-time. The Corps granted the permit, finding that there was no likelihood of an adverse impact on the environment. An environmental advocacy brought suit, asserting that the expansion would lead to increased environmental risk. The court found that the Corps cannot avoid preparing an EIS by making conclusory assertions that an activity will have only an insignificant impact on the environment. It should be noted that the court did not prohibit the Corps from ultimately granting the permit for the dock. It only decreed that the Corps must fully study the issue and the options prior to making a decision on whether to grant a permit. Ocean Advocates v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, No. 01-36133 (Source: HK Law)

Maritime Today


The Maritime Industry's original and most viewed E-News Service

Maritime Reporter June 2016 Digital Edition
FREE Maritime Reporter Subscription
Latest Maritime News    rss feeds

Legal

AMSA : ECDIS Related Detentions on the Rise

ClassNK has been informed by Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) that during PSC inspections it has been increasingly reported that vessels have been detained

CMA CGM Crosses 90% Ownership Threshold in NOL

CMA CGM S.A.  has crossed the 90% ownership threshold in Neptune Orient Lines Limited (NOL).    Following its all-cash voluntary conditional general offer (Offer)

UAE Top Court: Physical Bunkers Suppliers Have No Right to Recourse against Owners/Charterers

The OW saga - UAE Federal Supreme Court decides that physical suppliers of bunkers have no right to recourse against Owners/Charterers. In the first decision

 
 
Maritime Careers / Shipboard Positions Maritime Contracts Maritime Standards Naval Architecture Navigation Offshore Oil Pipelines Port Authority Ship Simulators Winch
rss | archive | history | articles | privacy | contributors | top maritime news | about us | copyright | maritime magazines
maritime security news | shipbuilding news | maritime industry | shipping news | maritime reporting | workboats news | ship design | maritime business

Time taken: 0.0924 sec (11 req/sec)