Foss Spill Costs $5M

Thursday, April 14, 2005
Foss Maritime Co., which was responsible for a December 2003 oil spill that fouled shorelines in Snohomish and Kitsap counties, will pay nearly $577,000 in state penalties, Jay Manning, director of the Department of Ecology (Ecology), announced.

"This spill was miniscule compared to the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska and the cleanup effort was aggressive, but the effects were still serious," Manning said. "The environment was damaged, the shellfishing was disrupted for months and it has turned out to be costly for the Foss Company."

A Foss barge spilled approximately 4,700 gallons of heavy fuel oil while being filled at the ChevronTexaco terminal at Point Wells in Snohomish County just after midnight on Dec. 30, 2003. Oil washed onto shore at the terminal and drifted across Puget Sound to coat beaches and the Doe-kag-wats marsh on the northern shore of Port Madison.

A Foss employee in charge of filling the barge miscalculated the flow rate into a tank during the fuel transfer. In addition, a detector and alarm to warn when barge tanks are about to overflow were improperly installed and gave no warning.

Foss conducted a 115-day effort to clean up the spill, under the supervision of Ecology, the U.S. Coast Guard, Kitsap County and the Suquamish Tribe.

The penalty amount is based on Ecology's finding that Foss was negligent in causing the spill -- a higher level of fault than "liable" but lower than a finding of "reckless or intentional" - and on the number of days of cleanup it took to meet environmental standards. "Foss has a record of being sensitive to the environment, but this spill simply should not have happened," said Manning.

"I commend Ecology for its exhaustive and thorough investigation on the Point Wells spill," said Bruce Reed, vice president of operations for Foss. "The spill was an unfortunate event, and Foss has taken the lessons learned from the incident and applied them to our oil-transfer operations."

Reed also apologized on behalf of the company for the effect the spill had on the local environment and residents, "especially the Suquamish Tribe, whose tribal waters and lands bore the greatest brunt of the release." In addition to the penalty, Foss is responsible for paying the cleanup costs, which amounted to more than $4.5 million, and for restoring the environmental resources that were damaged. The resource damage assessment is still being determined.

Maritime Reporter June 2015 Digital Edition
FREE Maritime Reporter Subscription
Latest Maritime News    rss feeds

Environmental

Hapag-Lloyd's New Noses Lower Emissions

Hamburg based shipping company Hapag-Lloyd plans for 24 of the largest containerships in its fleet to get new bulbous bows by 2016, with some of the vessels also

Charleston Harbor Deepening Gets US Funding

Charleston Harbor deepening project earns key federal funding for preconstruction engineering and design; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers allocates $1.303 million

The Hour of Power: Hybrid Marine Technology and Green Ports

In 2015 two significant developments are going to make many operators, owners and builders of professional vessels consider hybrid marine power. Firstly the new emissions laws in ports,

 
 
Maritime Careers / Shipboard Positions Maritime Contracts Naval Architecture Navigation Offshore Oil Pipelines Pod Propulsion Salvage Shipbuilding / Vessel Construction Winch
rss | archive | history | articles | privacy | contributors | top maritime news | about us | copyright | maritime magazines
maritime security news | shipbuilding news | maritime industry | shipping news | maritime reporting | workboats news | ship design | maritime business

Time taken: 0.3071 sec (3 req/sec)