IBIA: Unite Against EU Sulfur Proposals

Tuesday, April 23, 2002
The International Bunker Industry Association (IBIA) says proposed EU controls on marine fuels will hit shipping hard, with at least a $20 per ton fuel premium in EU waters by 2005. It says shipping should act now to make credible alternative proposals for an emissions trading system, before the European Commission acts to tighten sulphur rules this summer. At a recent meeting with the European Commission Directorate General, Environment, proposals were tabled for the control of air pollution from ships. They propose a consultation period ending summer 2002, followed by legislative changes which will come into force by 2005. A cap on the fuel sulphur levels for both locally trading vessels and also internationally trading vessels has been proposed as a straightforward method of reducing sulphur (SOx) emissions from ships. There is no doubt that the proposals will have a very significant impact upon fuel costs for all types of ships arriving at or operating in Europe. A meeting attended by IBIA was told that ships trading internationally will need to be operating on 1.5% sulfur fuel when passing thorough EU member state's territorial waters of the North Sea and Baltic. IBIA noted that this proposal is aligned with Marpol Annex VI provision for Sulphur Emission Control Areas, (SECAs). More worrying to IBIA members and the shipping community in general, is the purely regional requirement for international ships to switch to 0.2% sulphur fuel once in port and when practical to do so. A ship continuing on to another EU port, even if it is outside both territorial waters and the sea areas of the Baltic and North Sea, would be obliged to remain consuming 0.2% sulphur fuel throughout the voyage. A voyage between Gothenburg and Belfast would fall within the intra EU trading and require continuous use of 0.2% sulphur fuel. Ferries have been identified as a special exception in the proposals for intra EU trade, and are allowed to consume 1.5% sulphur fuel outside member state harbour limits. The IBIA representative, seeking clarification on the cap of 0.2% sulphur in harbours was advised that ferries trading between Calais and Dover would have the opportunity to switch to 1.5% sulphur fuel once the vessel had left the harbour limits. But the vessel must be consuming 0.2% sulphur fuel upon arrival at the destination harbour limits. It would be reasonable to conclude that the Dover/Calais ferry route will in future be operating on 0.2% sulphur fuel. The proposals do not draw a distinction between diesel and residual fuel. The suggestion is that fuels would be designated "EU grades" and classified by sulphur content. Expert advice to the Commission has suggested that availability of 1.5% sulphur fuel should not present a problem. The Commission was advised that any shortfall in 1.5% sulphur fuel could be easily blended from residual fuel and lower sulphur diesel fuel. At around $137/t for residual fuels (average sulphur content 2.5%) and $184/t for diesel, (assuming sulphur content is 0.2%), a blended 1.5% sulphur fuel would cost in the region of $157/t, around a $20/t premium over the regular residual fuel price. Ships needing a low sulphur fuel upon arrival will have to bunker 0.2% sulphur EU grade fuel to avoid contravention of the 0.2% sulphur in harbour limit. The words in the proposal are that ships can continue to use 1.5% sulphur fuel "until practical to take on 0.2%". In 2008 the 0.2% sulphur EU grade will become the 0.1% sulphur EU grade. IBIA fully supports the principles of reducing the contributions shipping makes to air emissions in areas where the density of shipping is having an impact upon local communities. But there is no doubt that more than one option exists for achieving emissions reductions. The Kyoto Protocol, recognizing the need for flexibility of solutions, enshrines the use of market mechanisms, the so called trading principles, as an acceptable method to achieve promised reductions of CO2 gases. Similar trading schemes have successfully reduced SOx and NOx emissions at lowest cost and often with very immediate reductions in emissions. IBIA is supporting BP Marine's initiatives to develop an emissions trading model for shipping in the North Sea and Baltic. The European Commission fully supports the emissions trading principles but report that it would not fit with its legislative timetable. It is up to the shipping community to demonstrate a credible alternative within the time constraints. The Commission timetable is for proposals for legislation amending the Sulphur in Liquid Fuels Directive by summer 2002 and entry into force from January 1, 2005. These changes will probably not need ministerial approval, so may be brought in without consultation at national level.
Maritime Reporter March 2014 Digital Edition
FREE Maritime Reporter Subscription
Latest Maritime News    rss feeds

Legal

Reports: Brazilian Tycoon Batista Investigated For Financial Crimes

Brazils federal police have opened an investigation into former billionaire Eike Batista for financial crimes, including insider trading, manipulation of markets and money laundering,

Shell Commited To Russia Expansion Despite Sanctions

Royal Dutch Shell is committed to expansion in Russia, Chief Executive Ben van Beurden told Russian President Vladimir Putin at a meeting on Friday amid sanctions

Ex-BP Employee Settles Insider-trading Oil Spill Case

A former 20-year veteran of BP plc who oversaw the company's cleanup efforts from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill will pay more than $224,000 to settle civil charges

 
 
Maritime Careers / Shipboard Positions Maritime Security Naval Architecture Pipelines Pod Propulsion Salvage Ship Repair Shipbuilding / Vessel Construction Sonar Winch
rss | archive | history | articles | privacy | contributors | top maritime news | about us | copyright | maritime magazines
maritime security news | shipbuilding news | maritime industry | shipping news | maritime reporting | workboats news | ship design | maritime business

Time taken: 0.0989 sec (10 req/sec)