Marine Link
Sunday, October 23, 2016

Choice of Law May Result in Claim Forfeiture

May 3, 2004

In an unpublished decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that a freely negotiated choice of law clause is binding, even where that choice tacitly included forfeiture of a claim. In the instant case, an insurance policy purchased by a ship owner included a clause providing that Norwegian law was controlling. Norwegian law does not recognize a maritime lien for unpaid insurance premiums. The ship owner went into bankruptcy, owing various debts, including the insurance premiums and various mortgages. The court held that, in transactions of an international character, a choice of law clause is binding unless the court finds that it would be unfair, unjust, or unreasonable to hold a party to its bargain. In re Millenium Seacarriers, Inc., No. 03-5028 (2nd Cir.) (HK Law)

Maritime Reporter Magazine Cover Oct 2016 - Marine Design Annual

Maritime Reporter and Engineering News’ first edition was published in New York City in 1883 and became our flagship publication in 1939. It is the world’s largest audited circulation magazine serving the global maritime industry, delivering more insightful editorial and news to more industry decision makers than any other source.

Maritime Reporter E-News subscription

Maritime Reporter E-News is the subsea industry's largest circulation and most authoritative ENews Service, delivered to your Email three times per week

Subscribe for Maritime Reporter E-News