Finally! At Last – Customs Admits Risk!

Dr. Jim Giermanski (taken from Maritime Professional 3Q print edition)
Friday, May 18, 2012
Dr. Jim Giermanski, Chairman, Powers Global Holdings, Inc.

For many years the Congress, GAO, and I many times, have criticized Customs and Border Protection (CBP) or not addressing or even acknowledging the security risks and loss of revenue from an antiquated, and ineffective in-bond systems that serves as a vulnerability to the security of the United States. However, in February, 2012, CBP has publically admitted the risk and the need to fix it.  

 

The Situation

An in-bond movement is the transportation of imported merchandise, secured by a bond, from one U.S. port to another prior to the appraisement of the merchandise and prior to the payment of duties. Currently, in-bond merchandise may be transported through the United States without appraisement or the payment of duties, provided the carrier or other appropriate party obtains a bond and files the appropriate transportation entry.  When the in-bond merchandise reaches its destination, it must be entered into U.S. commerce for consumption, entered for warehousing, or exported. The bond requires the bonded carrier to comply with all laws and regulations governing the receipt, safekeeping, and disposition of bonded merchandise. The transportation entry accounts for the movement of the merchandise during the in-bond process.  According to a 2007 Report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO),  in-bond shipments represent 30 to 60 percent of all imports that move through U.S. ports.


This in-bond system provides flexibility to importers and facilitates the flow of trade and commerce by allowing importers and other interested parties to choose when and where to enter imported merchandise into the commerce of the United States or when and where to warehouse or export the merchandise. This enables the importer to delay payment of applicable duties for imported merchandise. The in-bond system also allows merchandise to be transported and exported without the payment of duties and without having to meet all of the entry requirements necessary to enter the goods into the commerce of the United States.
 

However, its stated advantages serve as the core risk factors of this system. Therefore, in February, CBP published a notice of proposed rulemaking to effect changes to the current system.  Eleven fundamental categories of proposed changes in this 112-page document produce numerous other administrative changes to Federal regulations.  But within the 11 categories, essentially 5 proposed new rules for in-bond operations drive all the other changes:
 

  1. Require carriers or their agents to electronically file the in-bond application;
  2. Require additional information like, at least a 6-digit HTSUS number and/or information about the safety of the merchandise;
  3. Require a maximum of 30 days to transport in-bond merchandise between U.S. ports;
  4. Require carriers to electronically request CBP permission to divert in-bonds from their intended destination ports; and 
  5. Require carriers to report the arrival of in-bond merchandise and its location in the U.S. destination port.

 

Electronic Data Filing: The need to file in-bond information electronically or in “real time” is not only consistent with worldwide “single window” applications used by other Customs authorities, it helps to prevent the use of false and fraudulent documents and helps to control transshipments, re-routings, false declarations  concerning country or place of origin, and falsification of official documents. Electronic filings also can be more easily stored, maintained, and managed.   The natural question is why it has taken so long for CBP to propose electronic data filing for in-bonds.  Electronic filings should be done at origin, perhaps even by an authorized trusted third party who can verify the merchandise at the time of sealing the container or trailer.
 

Need for Additional Information: Incredible as it sounds, CBP admits that it doesn’t really know what the merchandise is and its level of safety when it transits the United States. The impact is twofold. CBP admits that the imprecise and vague descriptions by importers and shipping agents impede CBP’s targeting trade and revenue violations, and admits that there are potential “health, safety and conservation” issues if the merchandise is not identified at the level of a least a 6-digit Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) number. Not knowing precisely prevents CBP from notifying carriers whether additional inspections are needed. CBP further admits that it needs to know not only the description of the merchandise and its related safety issues but also the container identification number and seal number.
 

Uniform Time Limits for In-bond Transits: Because under the current system, air, vessel, and land conveyance all have different maximum transit time, these divergent transit times make it “confusing and burdensome,” and therefore, “difficult to enforce.”  Additionally, CBP admits that these “…in-bond shipments are often unaccounted for and transactions are open for too long a period of time, hindering CBP’s enforcement and targeting efforts.”   Except for pipeline, CBP believes that a standard 30 days to be sufficient for all modes of transport.
 

Permission to Divert In-Bonds: CBP acknowledges that in-bonds may be diverted without their knowledge.   The current diversion procedures make it virtually impossible for CBP to identify the ultimate destination of a diverted shipment and to determine whether the merchandise reaches that destination. This presents a security risk, a risk of circumvention of other agencies’ admissibility requirements and a risk that proper duties are not collected.    CPB further admits that the control of in-bonds …is critical to security and it necessary to ensure the proper collection of duties and to protect the health and safety of consumers.   In essence, CBP confirms what many U.S. Customs brokers have claimed: CBP does not know where the in-bond has been or how often it has been accessed since current mechanical seals are easily bypassed.
 

Reporting the Arrival and Locations of In-bonds: The current regulations require the carrier to report the arrival of in-bonds no more than 2 days after arrival at the destination U.S. port of export. Two days means that these in-bond shipments can be opened and contents manipulated. Complaints by Custom Brokers in Laredo, Texas seems to confirm this type of in-bond treatment that makes it impossible for CBP to know whether merchandise has be removed, added, or manipulated. The new rules required the carrier to report arrival within 24 hours.

 

Conclusion

These five primary proposed changes to the in-bond rules, drive many ancillary administrative changes. What is important is the recognition that the current in-bond system is broken and constitutes a serious security risk to the United States and the reason for lost revenue from not collecting the appropriate duties and taxes on those products that find their way into U.S. commerce. The current system can also be blamed for the increase of counterfeit products, drugs, and other contraband. Although these CBP proposed changes are positive and overdue, the remaining question is whether CBP training can prepare their personnel to manage and enforce a new system. But probably most significant is the admission by CBP that it is time for change!  Finally, At Last!
 

Dr. Jim Giermanski is Chairman, Powers Global Holdings, Inc., an international transportation security company. He has authored over 175 articles and is currently writing a global supply chain security book.
 

(taken from Maritime Professional 3Q print edition) 

Maritime Reporter July 2015 Digital Edition
FREE Maritime Reporter Subscription
Latest Maritime News    rss feeds

People & Company News

KEP Marine Unveils KMGBL

KEP Marine – the manufacturer of type approved displays, computers and peripherals, announced  the release of the affordable, high-quality KMGBL Glass Bridge Light Displays.

New Load Measurement Solution for Port of Dampier

Strainstall designs and delivers a load measurement solution for the world’s largest floating wharf at Port of Dampier.   Strainstall, part of James Fisher and Sons plc,

Rolls-Royce Power Package for USS Zumwalt

Rolls-Royce announced delivery of the twin fixed pitch propellers to Bath Iron Works for installation on the U.S. Navy’s most modern surface combatant, the future USS Zumwalt,

Container Ships

Diana Containerships Sells Panamax Ship

Diana Containerships Inc. sells Panamax containership, the m/v Cap Domingo   Diana Containerships Inc. today announced that it has signed, through a separate wholly-owned subsidiary,

Work Begins on $1.6 bln Container Terminal at Jebel Ali Port

DP World Chairman Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem announced the start of construction work on a brand new container terminal at Jebel Ali Port, Dubai.   Phase 1 of the

BTP Handles Millionth Container

Brazil’s newest container terminal hits a series of efficiency milestones   Brasil Terminal Portuário (BTP), Brazil’s newest container terminal in the Port of Santos,

Maritime Security

Voyager IP Wins Irish Navy Satellite Contract

Voyager IP, the Irish marine telecoms solutions specialist, has partnered with the Irish National Space Center to win a €500,000 contract to manage the entire satellite

China's Navy Drills in South China Sea

China said it conducted air and sea drills in the South China Sea on Tuesday as it stakes an increasingly assertive claim to virtually the whole sea despite rival claims by neighbours.

CMMI’s Maritime Potpourri Focuses on Raising the Bar

The growing popularity of “Maritime Potpourri” Conference organized by the Company of Master Mariners of India (CMMI) was evident yet again on 25th July, 2015

Government Update

BSEE Updates Hurricane Reporting Requirements

BSEE is providing updated guidance for the current and future hurricane seasons through a Notice to Lessees (NTL) released July 27, 2015. NTL 2015-G02 clarifies

Singapore MPA Wants LNG Bunkering Options

Singapore's Maritime Port Authority is seeking proposals on liquefied natural gas bunker supplies as it shifts away from fossil fuels towards gas while trying to

China's Navy Drills in South China Sea

China said it conducted air and sea drills in the South China Sea on Tuesday as it stakes an increasingly assertive claim to virtually the whole sea despite rival claims by neighbours.

Logistics

Egypt to Allow 24-hour Access to East Port Said with New Waterway

Egypt plans to allow smaller vessels in the Mediterranean direct access to East Port Said around the clock instead of just eight hours a day by building a side channel near the Suez Canal,

Offshore Wind Shift to Drive Vessel Services Cooperation

Evolving procurement processes for U.K. Round 3 offshore wind farms will require a greater number of work streams, personnel with new and differing skills, and

Work Begins on $1.6 bln Container Terminal at Jebel Ali Port

DP World Chairman Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem announced the start of construction work on a brand new container terminal at Jebel Ali Port, Dubai.   Phase 1 of the

 
 
Maritime Careers / Shipboard Positions Maritime Contracts Maritime Security Maritime Standards Navigation Offshore Oil Pod Propulsion Port Authority Sonar Winch
rss | archive | history | articles | privacy | contributors | top maritime news | about us | copyright | maritime magazines
maritime security news | shipbuilding news | maritime industry | shipping news | maritime reporting | workboats news | ship design | maritime business

Time taken: 0.1653 sec (6 req/sec)