ICS Comments on EU’s Maritime Antitrust Guidelines

(Press Release)
Tuesday, July 17, 2012

The European Commission has been conducting a review of its sector-specific Maritime Antitrust Guidelines, that were issued when the EU abolished liner conferences in 2008, and which the Commission suggests are no longer required. The International Chamber of Shipping (ICS) recently presented its comments to the Commission, which are published in full below:

Consultation on the Future of the Maritime Antitrust Guidelines
The International Chamber of Shipping (ICS) is pleased to respond to the Consultation on the Future of the Maritime Antitrust Guidelines as addressed in the Staff Working Document issued on 4 May.
ICS is the principal international trade association for shipowners, representing all sectors and trades and 80% of world merchant tonnage, including containership operators in liner trades, and tanker and dry bulk ship operators in ‘tramp’ trades, some of which utilise pooling arrangements. The membership of ICS comprises national shipowners’ associations from 36 countries, including national shipowners’ associations in the Americas and Asia, as well as members of the European Community Shipowners’ Associations (ECSA).
ICS fully supports the responses to the consultation submitted by ECSA and the World Shipping Council. ICS has no objection to the expiry of the sector-specific Maritime Competition Guidelines on information exchanges between competitors in liner shipping as from September 2013.
However, the statement above should not be regarded as an indication of ICS’s future position with respect to the continuation of the Consortia Block Exemption Regulation after 2015, the current position of ICS being that this particular block exemption should be renewed. Although a far looser form of co-operation than conferences, consortia provide stability to markets, helping guarantee the maintenance of scheduled services to more remote destinations and permitting efficiencies such as slot sharing on containerships.
If, moreover, the European Commission decides not to extend the sector-specific Maritime Competition Guidelines after September 2013, ICS also believes that it would be beneficial if the Commission could maintain the Maritime Competition Guidelines concerning pool agreements in tramp shipping, since these provide very useful guidance for ship operators on conducting self-assessment of pool agreements under the general EU competition rules.
Should the European Commission decide not to extend these tramp shipping Guidelines after September 2013, it is respectfully suggested that paragraphs 62 and 63 of these Guidelines should be maintained in the context of the General Antitrust Guidelines, perhaps via an annex or a footnote, as suggested by ECSA.
ICS recalls that the Guidelines on tramp shipping were not adopted to address the transition from a sector-specific regime to the full application of the general EU competition rules, as was the case with liner shipping in 2008 when conferences were prohibited. Rather they were adopted to offer guidance to tramp shipping operators to carry out a self-assessment of pool agreements due to the absence of any case law or other guidance for the tramp sector.
As a general point, ICS reiterates that it did not support the unilateral EU prohibition of liner conferences which came into effect in 2008. ICS continues to encourage the EU’s third country trading partners to maintain the status quo with respect to antitrust exemptions which they may continue to allow with respect inter alia to liner conferences and discussion agreements. ICS also supports the APEC Guidelines Related to Liner Shipping, adopted in June 2011, concerning the application of competition rules to non-rate fixing agreements.
ICS also notes the conclusions of the recent US Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) study, published in January 2012, which suggested that the repeal of the EU Block Exemption has apparently not resulted in any relative decline in EU freight rates compared with Far East/US trades. In other words, shippers in EU trades do not seem to have been advantaged as a result of the new EU regime compared to shippers in Far East/US trades where the EU prohibition does not apply. The US FMC also suggests that there appears to have been an increase in rate volatility in EU trades, compared to Far East/US trades, and that the activities of discussion agreements that are still permitted in non-EU trades may have had a ‘dampening effect’ on rate volatility.
We hope that these brief comments are helpful.
Simon Bennett, Director External Relations, International Chamber of Shipping
 


People & Company News

MN100: McAllister Towing

The Company: McAllister Towing & Transportation operates a fleet of more than 75 tugboats, crew boats and barges in 17 locations along the U.S. East Coast from Portland, ME to San Juan, PR.

MN100: Pacific Power Group

The Company: Established in 1958, Pacific Power Group has been a trusted partner for the marine power needs of the Western U.S. for more than 50 years. PPG provides

3sun CEO Chairs Offshore Wind SIG

3sun Group, specialist provider of products and services to the global energy industry, is reinforcing its ongoing commitment to the offshore wind industry with

Legal

Hyundai Merchant Marine to buy Hanjin's 'Good' Assets

South Korea's financial regulator said on Wednesday that Hyundai Merchant Marine Co Ltd will seek to acquire healthy assets of troubled shipper Hanjin Shipping Co Ltd.

Hanjin files for Receivership, Ports Turn Away Vessels

Hanjin says asks court for its assets to be frozen; Hyundai Merchant looking to buy Hanjin's "good" assets. South Korea's Hanjin Shipping Co Ltd filed for court

Hanjin Shipping to File for Court Receivership

South Korea’s biggest container shipping line Hanjin Shipping Co has decided to apply for court receivership after lenders halted all support, says a report in Bloomberg.

Government Update

Hyundai Merchant Marine to buy Hanjin's 'Good' Assets

South Korea's financial regulator said on Wednesday that Hyundai Merchant Marine Co Ltd will seek to acquire healthy assets of troubled shipper Hanjin Shipping Co Ltd.

Hanjin files for Receivership, Ports Turn Away Vessels

Hanjin says asks court for its assets to be frozen; Hyundai Merchant looking to buy Hanjin's "good" assets. South Korea's Hanjin Shipping Co Ltd filed for court

Hanjin Shipping to File for Court Receivership

South Korea’s biggest container shipping line Hanjin Shipping Co has decided to apply for court receivership after lenders halted all support, says a report in Bloomberg.

 
 
Maritime Careers / Shipboard Positions Maritime Security Maritime Standards Navigation Offshore Oil Pipelines Salvage Ship Electronics Ship Repair Shipbuilding / Vessel Construction
rss | archive | history | articles | privacy | contributors | top maritime news | about us | copyright | maritime magazines
maritime security news | shipbuilding news | maritime industry | shipping news | maritime reporting | workboats news | ship design | maritime business

Time taken: 0.1201 sec (8 req/sec)