Shippers Oppose Green Fuel Taxes

Wednesday, August 03, 2011

Shipper groups say the introduction of green fuel taxes will not reduce emissions. They claim that shipping lines will not switch to more environmentally-friendly fuels or more efficient ships, they will simply add yet another surcharge to the rates they charge their customers.
Nicolette van der Jagt, Secretary General of the ESC, told The Shippers’ Voice: “A uniform levy or tax on all ships and all fuel purchases would be a risk to shippers whichever way you look at it: the added costs will be merely passed on to the customers through surcharges without offering a clear incentive to the carrier to increase the efficiency of the ships or their operation.”
Most of the talk from the shipping sector and governmental organizations involves the establishment of a levy or tax on fuel that is proportionate to the level of emissions from each ship. The way to reduce such charges would be to score well on the recently-approved Energy Efficiency Design Index for ships, as agreed by the International Maritime Organization.
Shippers, including the Global Shippers Forum, the British Shippers’ Council and the European Shippers’ Council (ESC) say this strategy will not work.
Based on their track record, says the groups, the shipping industry, and particularly the liner shipping industry, is likely to pass on these charges to their customers.

Shippers can't be blamed for feeling this way, says a Shippers’ Voice spokesperson. “Every time the liner shipping industry finds another individual cost, it tries to pass it on in a surcharge or ancillary cost, whether it is for fuel price increases, currency fluctuations, being too busy (e.g. peak season surcharges), port strikes, congestion or even fog. Whatever the cost, the shipper is targeted to pay.”

That may seem reasonable to some: you only pay the cost of service. The trouble is, some shippers would argue that they do not always get the service they pay for anyway. Whether it is a delayed vessel, rolled over cargo (i.e. not loaded), or delivered to a different port at a different time than planned because of service changes, the shipper does not always get a good service.

Any business with poor service performance would be looking to rectify the problem so that the service being provided actually improved. But why bother when you can pass the costs on in the form of surcharges or, in an over-supplied market, the rate you get is not worth the effort, and the competition isn’t necessarily much better either?

So, shippers around the world believe a levy or tax will merely be passed on to them, and the ships will have very little incentive to change practice or improve design in order to reduce emission-related charges.

“What is needed is a mechanism which rewards shipping companies which invest in new designs, technology and practices which reduce emissions without reducing service performance; a scheme which does not add to current costs, but clearly provides an incentive to ship operators and owners,” says Shippers’ Voice.
This is a view echoed by van der Jagt: “The preferred approach should be one which provides tangible incentives and rewards to owners and operators of individual vessels who invest in ships and ship technologies that optimise vessel utilisation, operation and fleet sizes, and reduce emissions of GHGs. I believe that shippers will increasingly be drawn to those ships which attract lower costs for the supply chain from lower emissions, provided the service does not diminish.”

Maritime Reporter October 2014 Digital Edition
FREE Maritime Reporter Subscription
Latest Maritime News    rss feeds

Finance

New Company Takes Over OW Tanker

OW Tanker, a unit of bankrupt OW Bunker and owner of its marine fuel supply ships, has been taken over by a newly-created company, the fleet manager told Reuters on Wednesday.

WRRDA: Clearing the Channel for P3 Projects

A Creative Combination for Financing Inland Waterways Infrastructure Earlier this year, the U.S. maritime industry in general, and the inland waterways industry in particular,

Choosing the Best Financing Proposal

It isn’t always about the rate. In a robust boatbuilding market – like the one we see now – even the most successful, financially stable operators need to borrow.

Environmental

MSC Approves SOLAS Amendments

SOLAS amendments to make IGF Code mandatory approved by Maritime Safety Committee   The International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) Maritime Safety Committee (MSC),

WRRDA: Clearing the Channel for P3 Projects

A Creative Combination for Financing Inland Waterways Infrastructure Earlier this year, the U.S. maritime industry in general, and the inland waterways industry in particular,

Stena Bulk Joins World Ocean Council

Stena Bulk reports it is the first Swedish shipping company to join the World Ocean Council (WOC), a global organization that converges a diverse range of maritime

News

ClassNK Approves Niigata Dual-fuel Engine Design

Classification society ClassNK has granted approval to the design of the new 28AHX-DF dual-fuel engine developed by Niigata Power Systems Co., Ltd. The new engine

MacGregor Deck Equipment for Intership's Eco-bulkers

MacGregor, part of Cargotec, has secured a deck equipment contract from New Times Shipyard in China for Intership Navigation Co Ltd.'s three new 36,500 dwt laker-class bulk carriers.

W&O, LESER Partner to Deliver Safety Relief Valves

W&O, a global supplier to the marine and upstream oil and gas markets for pipe, valves and fittings, valve automation and engineered solutions, has partnered with

 
 
Maritime Careers / Shipboard Positions Maritime Contracts Navigation Offshore Oil Pipelines Port Authority Ship Electronics Ship Repair Shipbuilding / Vessel Construction Winch
rss | archive | history | articles | privacy | terms and conditions | contributors | top maritime news | about us | copyright | maritime magazines
maritime security news | shipbuilding news | maritime industry | shipping news | maritime reporting | workboats news | ship design | maritime business

Time taken: 0.2356 sec (4 req/sec)