Fuel for the Bunker Surcharge Fire

Drewry Maritime Research
Monday, September 16, 2013
Ocean Carrier BAFs From Asia to WCNA Since Jan 2012. Source: Drewry Maritime Research

The way carriers calculate bunker surcharges is often disputed by shippers, and no more so than now. Drewry Maritime Research explains.


Bunker surcharges should, proportionately, have been reducing faster than fuel prices because of the deployment of more efficient ships, but this does not appear to have happened for most carriers. The issue is highlighted by two recent developments in the container industry. Firstly, the arrival of Maersk’s first 18,000 teu vessels, and secondly, the availability of really cheap fuel in Russian ports again.


As explained in ‘Why size matters’ (http://ciw.drewry.co.uk/features/why-size-matters/#.Ui8TuL5wbiw), 18,000 teu vessels burn approximately 35% less fuel per teu carried on a round voyage basis between Asia and Northern Europe than 13,100 teu vessels ($218/teu versus $333/teu), and 13,100 teu vessels burn 20% less than a 9,000 teu vessels ($333/teu versus $415/teu), assuming constant speeds of 20 knots westbound and 14.6 knots eastbound, and that the bigger vessels will be less full. In turn, 9,000 teu vessels burn approximately 23% less than 6,000 teu vessels ($415/teu versus $542/teu).

The pace of change has been gathering momentum. In 3Q 11, the average size of vessel deployed between Asia and Northern Europe was just 9,158 teu, which increased by 8% in the next twelve months, up to 9,881 teu, and by another 9% in the next twelve months, up to over 10,800 teu. The change in the transpacific was slightly less, being 7% between 3Q 11 and 3Q 12, up to 6,264 teu, but only 1% between 3Q 12 and 3Q 13, up to 6,320 teu.
This means that bunker surcharge levels should have been falling faster than fuel prices since 3Q 12, which is not immediately apparent from Figures below – except for Maersk Line, due to the dramatic revision of its Standard Bunker Adjustment Factor (SBF) formula on 4 June, 2013, which explains why overall averages have subsequently dropped.


For more information, Email: simonr@drewry.co.uk

 

  • Bunker Prices and Carrier BAF: Asia-WCNA. Note: *Based on average of Singapore and Rotterdam. Source: Drewry Maritime Research

    Bunker Prices and Carrier BAF: Asia-WCNA. Note: *Based on average of Singapore and Rotterdam. Source: Drewry Maritime Research

  • Asia to N Europe BAFs Since Jan 2012. Source: Drewry Maritime Research

    Asia to N Europe BAFs Since Jan 2012. Source: Drewry Maritime Research

  • Bunker Prices and Carrier BAF: Asia-North Europe. Source: Drewry Maritime Research

    Bunker Prices and Carrier BAF: Asia-North Europe. Source: Drewry Maritime Research

  • Bunker Prices and Carrier BAF: Asia-WCNA. Note: *Based on average of Singapore and Rotterdam. Source: Drewry Maritime Research
  • Asia to N Europe BAFs Since Jan 2012. Source: Drewry Maritime Research
  • Bunker Prices and Carrier BAF: Asia-North Europe. Source: Drewry Maritime Research
Maritime Reporter September 2014 Digital Edition
FREE Maritime Reporter Subscription
Latest Maritime News    rss feeds

Finance

New York, London Juxtaposed by New Maritime Event

On November 13, the newly formed New York Maritime Consortium, a coalition of leaders from New York Maritime Inc. (NYMAR), the Society of Maritime Arbitrators (SMA),

Caterpillar: Q3 Results Show Improvement

Caterpillar Inc. today announced its third-quarter results, in which it reported profit per share of $1.63 for the third quarter of 2014, an increase from third-quarter 2013 profit per share of $1.

Wärtsilä Expects 5% Sales Growth

Wärtsilä announced its third quarter results, reporting that it sees good development in order intake and profitability. According to Wärtsilä, third quarter

Fuels & Lubes

ABB: Remote Monitoring Link to Fuel Efficiency

Anticipating the maintenance of equipment on board ships in order to increase fuel efficiency could be a “real game changer in the future,” said Andreas Zito, chief technical officer of the V.

IBIA Welcomes MEPC Bunker Compromise

The compromise solution on the issue of ensuring bunker quality agreed at the 67th meeting of the IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC 67) has been

MEPC Makes Progress on Energy Efficiency, Emissions

The Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) met for its 67th session from October 13-17, 2014, at IMO Headquarters in London.

 
 
Maritime Contracts Maritime Security Navigation Pipelines Port Authority Salvage Ship Electronics Ship Simulators Shipbuilding / Vessel Construction Winch
rss | archive | history | articles | privacy | terms and conditions | contributors | top maritime news | about us | copyright | maritime magazines
maritime security news | shipbuilding news | maritime industry | shipping news | maritime reporting | workboats news | ship design | maritime business

Time taken: 0.2314 sec (4 req/sec)