Charter Party Dispute: Shipowner Acted Unreasonably

MaritimePropulsion.com
Monday, September 09, 2013

In a recent decision, the Commercial Court held that a shipowner's refusal to allow two VLCC's nominated by the charterers to carry out STS transfer operations was unreasonable. The decision was noted by Hattie Sumption, partner at Clyde & Co LLP as follows:

Facts

A vessel was chartered to carry crude from Yemen to the Far East. The charterer also nominated 2 VLCCs to act as storage and receive the cargo at the discharge port by way of STS transfer. The owner of the chartered vessel withheld its approval of the 2 VLCCs and the charterer therefore had to discharge the cargo into smaller vessels to shuttle the cargo into the VLCCs.

Charter Party Terms

The charter party provided that if the charterer required ship-to ship transfer operations, all vessels to be used would be 'subject to the prior approval of owners, which not to be unreasonably withheld...'. It further provided that 'Charterers shall have the option of transferring... cargo... to or from any vessel including, but not limited to, an ocean-going vessel... All transfers... shall be carried out in accordance with the recommendations set out in the latest edition of the 'ICS/OCIMF Ship to Ship Transfer Guide (Petroleum)'.

Judgment


The Court held that the shipowner unreasonably withheld its approval of the 2 nominated VLCCs. On a proper construction of the charter party terms, the shipowner's right of approval was limited to an approval of a nominated vessel by reference to its suitability to the proposed STS operation and did not extend to a right to approve the proposed STS operation itself. In this context, the phrase 'not to be unreasonably withheld' was found to mean that the shipowner which refused approval was not allowed to base its decision on something other than the specific facts of the matter in question. 


The shipowner in this case had a company policy of not allowing STS between VLCCs, as a result of a previous incident. This was not sufficient grounds for a reasonable shipowner to decline approval in the present case. There was nothing inherent in the characteristics of the 2 nominated VLCCs that made a veto of the STS transfers involving them reasonable. Although there was no section in the ICS/OCIMF guide specifically relating to STS between VLCCs, this did not mean that STS operations could not be conducted in accordance with it: with adequate planning and precautions, STS could have been performed in accordance with the guide and therefore in accordance with the charter party.

Comment

The Court examined both the terms of the charter party and the specific facts of the case. Although the facts will vary between each case, the judgment does provide guidance on how the Court is likely to construe similar contentions made by shipowners in future, for example facts relating to the specific operation itself will be deemed to be irrelevant. STS between VLCCs should not be regarded as inherently suspect but should be considered on a case-by-case basis.

Court of Appeal

The decision is being appealed, and a further update will follow after the outcome of the appeal hearing, which has been fixed for early 2014.

Source: UK P&I Club/Hattie Sumption, partner at Clyde & Co LLP
 

Maritime Today


The Maritime Industry's original and most viewed E-News Service

Maritime Reporter June 2016 Digital Edition
FREE Maritime Reporter Subscription
Latest Maritime News    rss feeds

Contracts

POSH Bags Shell FLNG Contract

Singapore’s offshore marine services provider PACC Offshore Services Holdings Ltd. (POSH) has been awarded a contract to support Shell’s Prelude floating liquefied

Baltic Index up for Third Straight Session

The Baltic Exchange's main sea freight index, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities, rose on Friday, for a third straight session, on rising demand across all vessel segments.

Asia Tankers-VLCC Rates to Climb Slowly

Around 47 MidEast charters fixed for July loading so far; older tonnage and new vessels a drag on freight rates. Freight rates for very large crude carriers

Legal

Statoil’s 50 years to be Recorded

Statoil has decided to launch a large project to write the story about the company for its 50th anniversary in 2022. The University of Oslo has been chosen the

MISC Publishes its 2015 Sustainability Report

MISC Berhad (MISC) today announces the publication of its 2015 Sustainability Report, covering the Company’s commitment, strategy and performance for the year ended

Vandermeiren is CEO, Antwerp Port

Jacques Vandermeiren (52) has been appointed CEO of Antwerp Port Authority as of 1 January 2017. He succeeds Eddy Bruyninckx who after 25 years at the head of the

Tanker Trends

VL-exit?

Earlier this week spot returns in the VLCC market touched their lowest level since October 2014, with TCE earnings for Middle East/Japan (TD3) falling close to $20,

RS Rules Conform to the IMO Goal-based Standards

The rules of the Russian Maritime Register of Shipping are in conformity to the International Maritime Organization (IMO)goal-based standards (GBS), the IMO’s Maritime

Asia Tankers-VLCC Rates to Climb Slowly

Around 47 MidEast charters fixed for July loading so far; older tonnage and new vessels a drag on freight rates. Freight rates for very large crude carriers

 
 
Maritime Careers / Shipboard Positions Maritime Contracts Maritime Security Naval Architecture Offshore Oil Pipelines Salvage Ship Electronics Sonar Winch
rss | archive | history | articles | privacy | contributors | top maritime news | about us | copyright | maritime magazines
maritime security news | shipbuilding news | maritime industry | shipping news | maritime reporting | workboats news | ship design | maritime business

Time taken: 0.1429 sec (7 req/sec)