Marine link
 

Dominance From Down Under

The Australian shipping industry is experiencing turmoil as the release of a report from federal government-commissioned task force Shipping Reform Group has moved major reforms, intended to prune shipping costs by $116 million a year, a step closer to being realized. The report recommends that cabotage be phased out during an 18-month period, allowing foreign vessels to compete with Australian ships carrying domestic cargo along the Australian coast. The task force proposals also call for Australian ships to be allowed to employ cheaper foreign crews, a move that, if pursued, will likely be met with strong resistance from the maritime union. Seafarers on Australia's coastal shipping routes would also be made to work 31 weeks a year, not the present 27. In return for compliance, and to help it adjust, the shipping industry would be offered tax incentives.

Austal's 196.8-ft. (60-m) Auto Express high-capacity catamaran for Turkey's Istanbul Deniz Otobusleri.

Both the foremost union body in Australia, the ACTU, and the Maritime Union of Australia, have rejected the report.

According to Transport Minister John Sharp, who anticipates a rapid decline in Australia's shipping industry if reforms are not made, cargo rates for Australian ships were almost one-third higher than for foreign ships.

The report has also flagged a second shipping register to encourage more ships to register under the Australian flag. Both Australian and foreign crews could use the second register, which would be controlled by Australian managers, masters and chief engineers, that would offer tax incentives and more flexible labor arrangements than the existing register. But if the Australian crew failed to deliver cost savings, ships would be permitted to hire foreign crews.

The report, put together by business and industry leaders, indicated reform could cut costs by more than 25 percent. Using foreign crews could save a company substantial revenues, as Australian ships reportedly cost $1.55 million a year more to operate than other OECD countries, primarily due to crew costs. Whether these reforms are implemented or not remains to be seen. In the meantime, Australian maritime companies are proceeding with business as usual.




Ship Electronics History

A Call For Clarification In Bareboat Chartering Law
Austal Enters Japanese Market With $7.8 Million Sale
Avondale Delivers Navy Ship; Launches Product/Chemical Carrier
Caterpillar Engines Chosen To Power New Generation Of Buoy Tenders
Cruise Ship And Ferry Costs In The 90s
Cruise Ship Interiors: Pushing The Boundaries
Cruising In The U.S.A
CTR Looks To Build An Instant Floot, Calling For 59 Ships In Four Yoars
European Consortium To Develop A Ship Hull Integrity Program
Great Ships Of 1994
Hitachi Zosen Delivers Catamaran & 3,800-TEU Containership
IIW Begins Fabrication On Aegis Flight IIA Destroyers
IMO Further Amends SOLAS
ISDP Offers Software For Ship Design And Production
Launching Ceremony For MCM-14 "Chief" At Peterson Builders, Inc.
Merged STN Atlas Elektronik Exhibits Extensive Range Of Products At SMM '94
NAVY CONTRACTING Cost Growth Continues On Ship Construction Contracts
NEWPORT NEWS: Tackling The Commercial Market With New Product Tanker Design
NNS Wins $65 M Contract For Submarine Work
Stage Set For Newbuilding Activity
Status of U.S. Shipbuilding Assistance Programs
Techno Superliner Prototype Hits 54 Knots During Tests
The Tanker Market: Which Way Is Up?
The U.S. Cruise Market
The U.S. Cruise Market
To Cruise Or Not To Cruise, Really, Is Not The Question
Trinity's Halter Marine Wins $47.2 M For Navy Oceanographic Ship
U.S. Government Allocates $9.3 Million For SLICE Technology
U.S. Government Allocates $9.3 Million For SLICE Technology
Vision And Flexibility — Marks Of A Leader
 
rss feeds | archive | privacy | history | articles | contributors | top news | contact us | about us | copyright