Marine link
 

Dominance From Down Under

The Australian shipping industry is experiencing turmoil as the release of a report from federal government-commissioned task force Shipping Reform Group has moved major reforms, intended to prune shipping costs by $116 million a year, a step closer to being realized. The report recommends that cabotage be phased out during an 18-month period, allowing foreign vessels to compete with Australian ships carrying domestic cargo along the Australian coast. The task force proposals also call for Australian ships to be allowed to employ cheaper foreign crews, a move that, if pursued, will likely be met with strong resistance from the maritime union. Seafarers on Australia's coastal shipping routes would also be made to work 31 weeks a year, not the present 27. In return for compliance, and to help it adjust, the shipping industry would be offered tax incentives.

Austal's 196.8-ft. (60-m) Auto Express high-capacity catamaran for Turkey's Istanbul Deniz Otobusleri.

Both the foremost union body in Australia, the ACTU, and the Maritime Union of Australia, have rejected the report.

According to Transport Minister John Sharp, who anticipates a rapid decline in Australia's shipping industry if reforms are not made, cargo rates for Australian ships were almost one-third higher than for foreign ships.

The report has also flagged a second shipping register to encourage more ships to register under the Australian flag. Both Australian and foreign crews could use the second register, which would be controlled by Australian managers, masters and chief engineers, that would offer tax incentives and more flexible labor arrangements than the existing register. But if the Australian crew failed to deliver cost savings, ships would be permitted to hire foreign crews.

The report, put together by business and industry leaders, indicated reform could cut costs by more than 25 percent. Using foreign crews could save a company substantial revenues, as Australian ships reportedly cost $1.55 million a year more to operate than other OECD countries, primarily due to crew costs. Whether these reforms are implemented or not remains to be seen. In the meantime, Australian maritime companies are proceeding with business as usual.




Ship Electronics History

Austal Enters Japanese Market With $7.8 Million Sale
Construction Of Disney Magic Begins At Fincantiori
Cruise Ship Segment Once Again Recipient Of Good News, Orders
European Builders Make Inreads In Cruise And Feriy Sectors
Hitachi Zosen Completes 3,800-TEU Containership Zhen He 45-Knot Hull Form
Hitachi Zosen Delivers Catamaran & 3,800-TEU Containership
IMO Further Amends SOLAS
Ingalls Ship Named In Honor Of World War II Hero
INNOVATIVE CONVERSION
INS Signs Contract To Build Eletson Double Eagle Tankers
Intermarine Launches Fifth Osprey Class Minehunter For U.S. Navy
Launching Ceremony For MCM-14 "Chief" At Peterson Builders, Inc.
Making Ends Meet: Juggling With Finances Can Help Shipowners Achieve Profitability
Making Ship Production More Profitable
MarAd News
Navatek And Lockheed Team Up On SWATH Ship Design
Navigating Rough Waters
NEWPORT NEWS: Tackling The Commercial Market With New Product Tanker Design
NEWPORT NEWS: Tackling The Commercial Market With New Product Tanker Design
Proteus Engineering Releases New VisualSMP Seakeeping Softwan
RCI Is Taking The Plunge
Status of U.S. Shipbuilding Assistance Programs
Status of U.S. Shipbuilding Assistance Programs
Stern Flap System Dubbed Technical Breakthrough
The Outlook For U.S. Shipbuilding
To Cruise Or Not To Cruise, Really, Is Not The Question
U.S. Government Allocates $9.3 Million For SLICE Technology
U.S. yard looks to chemical tankers as launching pad
USCG Rates Classification Societies
Vision And Flexibility — Marks Of A Leader
 
rss feeds | archive | privacy | history | articles | contributors | top news | contact us | about us | copyright