Shifting Risk

By Charlie Pugliese, Ocean Marine Hull and Liability Practice Leader, Travelers
Tuesday, October 09, 2012

The Fine Print Can Make a Big Difference

Whether it is a consent form at a hospital, a liability waiver for a team sport or a permission slip for a school field trip, many people sign risk transfer forms with only a cursory thought to what they are agreeing to. If they want to participate, they may feel they have little choice other than to go along with whatever is written on the form.
But in the business world, risk transfer forms should not be signed without giving attention to the details and considering the potential outcomes. The fine print of the documents you sign or require your contractors to sign is just as vital to your risk control strategy as having good fire suppression equipment or an effective building security system.
A good rule of thumb: before signing any contract that requires you or a contractor to accept liability, step back and think about how your business would be affected if something goes wrong. Is your business properly protected? What factors should be considered when requiring a contractor to sign these types of agreements? To make sure, work with your insurance agent and legal counsel to understand your options before inadvertently signing something which in retrospect you may wish you hadn’t.
Common sense would indicate that if someone else makes a mistake or causes a problem, the liability will rest on their shoulders. However, insurers see examples every day of situations that lead to unexpected results for unwary businesses. For example:
•    As part of the contract to make repairs to a barge, a shipyard may have the owner sign a form limiting any liability to the dollar amount of the repair work being done. If a $1 million barge in for $75,000 worth of repairs catches fire and is destroyed, the shipyard may be only liable for $75,000. While unhappy, the barge owner may take comfort in the thought that his hull insurance will pick up the remaining loss – until he reads the fine print closely and sees that his hull insurance may have a provision that limits coverage when a liability waiver is signed.
•    A marina hires a small company to replace an awning over the office window. The awning company’s employees show up, use their own ladders and equipment – and then one of them falls, injuring his head. The employee may not be able to sue his employer or collect damages beyond those provided by the worker’s compensation law for that state. However, he may be able to sue the marina owner, even though the marina may have had nothing to do with the accident. Had the marina been added to the awning company’s insurance and insisted on an indemnity provision, the marina could have relied on the awning company’s coverage for primary protection.
•    After being awarded a job by a shipyard, a boiler repair contractor is told he cannot be hired unless he signs a contract agreeing to add the shipyard as an insured to his insurance policy and hold the shipyard harmless for any insurance claims. He signs the contract, although it leaves him open to being sued by a claimant for anything that happens in the shipyard, even something unrelated to the work he is doing.
The contractor’s insurer, however, insists on a provision that makes the contractor responsible only for damages he causes. The shipyard may be unaware of the change because it accepts a certificate of insurance from the contractor’s agent, rather than requiring an endorsement directly from the insurer that would spell out coverage.
In each of these cases, risk is being shifted to others. Whether it is a business doing the hiring and a contractor doing the work, or a business accepting an assignment and the customer approving the work to be done, the important thing for both sides is to accept the liability that they should be responsible for, and to be cognizant of the repercussions of agreements they may sign.

What to Watch For
While common sense may not seem to have much staying power in the world of claims and counterclaims, it plays a strong role in an effective risk transfer strategy. First and foremost, your company should look to be sure that anyone you do business with is properly insured to perform the required work, including normal commercial coverage (general liability, comprehensive, auto, etc.) and appropriate specialty coverage, such as ship repairers legal liability. Second, there should be a central point of control for your risk transfer decisions and documentation. Not only is it important to seek professional advice from an insurance broker and legal counsel, but it is also critical to have the paperwork in order every time a contractor is engaged or a customer requires a service. Last year’s endorsement by an insurer may be meaningless this year. And finally, it is important to follow proper procedures so that the outcome is what you expect. For example, there is a right way and a wrong way to “name and waive” – the shorthand reference for having someone added to a policy as an “additional insured” and holding them harmless in the event of a claim. Here are three key elements to consider:

If you add someone to your policy and indemnify them for all insurance claims, you may run the risk (as noted in the boiler repair example above) of having a claimant for a completely unrelated incident come after your insurance for damages. Instead, ensure that you are only holding the other party harmless for damages that you or your work may cause.

If an accident occurs and claims are made against you and the company you added to your policy, look to see if the limit for the policy is shared by you both. For example, if two bystanders are harmed by a boiler explosion and both the repairman and the shipyard are sued, a $1 million policy may provide only up to that amount for the same incident. This may factor into a shipyard’s decision on the amount of liability coverage it requires its contractors to carry (e.g., a boiler repair contractor may be asked to provide greater limits than a painting contractor because of the greater risk from the work involved).

To make sure you have been added to a policy, require an endorsement from the insurance company. Agents can and do issue certificates of insurance, but only the actual endorsement lets you know exactly what the insurance company has agreed to.
How you handle risks may make the difference between staying in business or struggling to survive when a claim exceeds your resources. Just as you would provide fire protection equipment where welders are working or set the alarm system before leaving the premises at night, it’s important to have sound practices and an effective strategy for transferring risk. By working closely with your insurance agent and legal counsel, you increase the likelihood that the fine print does what you want and holds no unpleasant surprises. 


(As published in the September 2012 edition of Maritime Reporter - www.marinelink.com)

Maritime Reporter July 2014 Digital Edition
FREE Maritime Reporter Subscription
Latest Maritime News    rss feeds

Contracts

Port of New Orleans Awards Terminal Build Contract

The Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans awarded a $13.3 million construction contract to Metairie, La.-based Hard Rock Construction LLC today for

Two MacGregor Subsea Cranes Ordered for Chinese PSVs

MacGregor, part of Cargotec, has secured a new contract from Chinese shipbuilder, Fujian Mawei Shipbuilding Ltd., for two 100-metric-ton active heave-compensated subsea MacGregor cranes.

Topaz Secures $75m Investment from SCPE

Topaz Energy and Marine, an offshore support vessel company with primary operations in the Caspian, Middle East, West Africa and Subsea operations in the North Sea and Gulf of Mexico,

Ship Repair & Conversion

Permanent On-site Collision Damage Repair in Greece

In July Hydrex mobilized a team of diver/technicians to Syros, Greece, for a complex repair operation on a 118-meter, 8550 DWT chemical tanker. The vessel had suffered

Pipeline Corrosion Shutters Statoil's Troll C Platform

Norway's Statoil shut oil and gas production at its Troll C platform in the North Sea after inspections found corrosion damage on a pipeline, the company said in

Maritime Reporter @ 75: The Daily Cartoon

Maritime Reporter & Engineering News was founded by John J. O'Malley (1905-1980) in 1939, and today ranks as the world's largest audited trade publication in the world serving the maritime industry,

Insurance

HK's COSCO International Reports Strong Profit Growth

For the  six months ended 30th June 2014, shipping services provider COSCO International has announced that its 2014 Interim Results show strong profit growth with Net Profit up 45% YOY.

American Club Issues Steel Cargo Warning

The American P&I Club has updated its advice to members on the handling of steel cargoes. It has done so in consequence of some recent cases where the absence of

NASCO Win AEU Longshoreman Safety Award

The North America Stevedoring Company (NASCO) division (Chicago) of Quebec Stevedoring says it has received a coveted award under the American Equity Underwriters Inc.

 
 
Maritime Careers / Shipboard Positions Maritime Contracts Maritime Security Navigation Pipelines Pod Propulsion Port Authority Salvage Ship Simulators Sonar
rss | archive | history | articles | privacy | terms and conditions | contributors | top maritime news | about us | copyright | maritime magazines
maritime security news | shipbuilding news | maritime industry | shipping news | maritime reporting | workboats news | ship design | maritime business

Time taken: 0.2230 sec (4 req/sec)