LNG Terminal Proposal Debated

Monday, February 13, 2006
Since hurricanes Katrina and Rita slammed the Gulf Coast nearly five months ago, the region has lost more than 610 billion cubic feet of natural gas production. There is no single solution to offsetting supply disruptions, but economists, industry executives and analysts advocate placing above-ground storage tanks along the nation's coasts where energy companies can store imported liquefied natural gas, also known as LNG. Once stored in these receiving terminals, the natural gas would be shipped via pipelines throughout the United States. Proponents say the tanks are safe, a vital means to energy companies' organic growth and a way to help ease a possible drag on the economy. Critics, however, say these storage tanks - each the size of a baseball field - are potentially dangerous, especially in densely populated regions, and an easy terrorist target. For now, there are four onshore LNG storage terminals, one each in Massachusetts, Maryland, Georgia and Louisiana that date to the mid-1980s, plus an offshore terminal in the Gulf of Mexico. Most of the proposed sites are along the energy friendly Gulf Coast, fresh off two major hurricanes but also where infrastructure - pipelines, shipping channels and ports - are in place. Proposals along the coasts, however, are being met with steadfast resistance from communities fearing the fallout from an accident or terrorist attack. LNG terminals import about 3 percent of the nation's natural gas. The U.S. also imports another 12 percent of its natural gas, but not LNG, from Canada. It produces the remaining 85 percent. Industry analysts and executives estimate that percentage of LNG imports could reach 15 percent of U.S. natural gas by 2012.

(Source: Seattle Post-Intelligencer)

Maritime Reporter September 2014 Digital Edition
FREE Maritime Reporter Subscription
Latest Maritime News    rss feeds

LNG

Weak Oil Threatens US Export of LNG

Plunging global oil prices may turn hopes for cheap liquefied natural gas supplies from the United States into a costly disappointment for Asian buyers who have

Singapore’s MPA Discuss LNG Bunkering

The Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA), Antwerp Port Authority, Port of Rotterdam and Port of Zeebrugge participated in a Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)

New Standard for LNG Cargo Containment Systems

Wilhelmsen Technical Solutions (WTS) said it has successfully completing the gas trial for the first LNG carrier built to a Boil Off Rate (BOR) of 0.08% per day.

 
 
Maritime Careers / Shipboard Positions Maritime Security Maritime Standards Naval Architecture Navigation Pipelines Ship Repair Shipbuilding / Vessel Construction Sonar Winch
rss | archive | history | articles | privacy | terms and conditions | contributors | top maritime news | about us | copyright | maritime magazines
maritime security news | shipbuilding news | maritime industry | shipping news | maritime reporting | workboats news | ship design | maritime business

Time taken: 0.1447 sec (7 req/sec)