LNG Terminal Proposal Debated

Monday, February 13, 2006
Since hurricanes Katrina and Rita slammed the Gulf Coast nearly five months ago, the region has lost more than 610 billion cubic feet of natural gas production. There is no single solution to offsetting supply disruptions, but economists, industry executives and analysts advocate placing above-ground storage tanks along the nation's coasts where energy companies can store imported liquefied natural gas, also known as LNG. Once stored in these receiving terminals, the natural gas would be shipped via pipelines throughout the United States. Proponents say the tanks are safe, a vital means to energy companies' organic growth and a way to help ease a possible drag on the economy. Critics, however, say these storage tanks - each the size of a baseball field - are potentially dangerous, especially in densely populated regions, and an easy terrorist target. For now, there are four onshore LNG storage terminals, one each in Massachusetts, Maryland, Georgia and Louisiana that date to the mid-1980s, plus an offshore terminal in the Gulf of Mexico. Most of the proposed sites are along the energy friendly Gulf Coast, fresh off two major hurricanes but also where infrastructure - pipelines, shipping channels and ports - are in place. Proposals along the coasts, however, are being met with steadfast resistance from communities fearing the fallout from an accident or terrorist attack. LNG terminals import about 3 percent of the nation's natural gas. The U.S. also imports another 12 percent of its natural gas, but not LNG, from Canada. It produces the remaining 85 percent. Industry analysts and executives estimate that percentage of LNG imports could reach 15 percent of U.S. natural gas by 2012.

(Source: Seattle Post-Intelligencer)

Maritime Reporter July 2014 Digital Edition
FREE Maritime Reporter Subscription
Latest Maritime News    rss feeds

LNG

MARAD: Total Fuel Cycle Study for Natural Gas

The Maritime Administration (MARAD) released a study that evaluates total fuel cycle emissions for natural gas versus conventional marine fuels. Results showed

LNG Transport Barge Design Approved by ABS

Conrad Shipyard, L.L.C. engaged Bristol Harbor Group, Inc. (BHGI) to develop a 3,000 cubic meter Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) transport barge utilizing a Bristol

Banking on US Shale Gas Boom, Asia Petrochemical Firms Switch to LPG

Asia petrochemicals firms are building tanks and retooling plants to store and process liquefied petroleum gas imported from the United States, counting on a flood

 
 
Maritime Careers / Shipboard Positions Maritime Contracts Maritime Security Maritime Standards Naval Architecture Offshore Oil Port Authority Salvage Ship Electronics Sonar
rss | archive | history | articles | privacy | terms and conditions | contributors | top maritime news | about us | copyright | maritime magazines
maritime security news | shipbuilding news | maritime industry | shipping news | maritime reporting | workboats news | ship design | maritime business

Time taken: 0.2128 sec (5 req/sec)