Mega-Containerships Trigger Terminal Shake-ups

By George Backwell
Tuesday, June 03, 2014
Illustration of TEU Volumes per Port Call: Source: Drewry Maritime Research

Bigger container ships are resulting in much greater peaks in container terminal activity, which together with the ever larger combined volumes of bigger alliances, demands fewer, larger terminals in each port. Terminal operators are reacting by consolidating terminal layouts and ownership – and by working more closely together – but what are the consequences for their customers? Drewry Maritime Research discuss in this extract from their latest 'Container Insight Weekly'.

A recent visit to the Eurogate terminal in Hamburg by China Shipping’s post-Panamax vessel CSCL Le Havre involved an exchange of 11,600 teu, illustrating the sheer scale of volumes per call that terminals increasingly have to deal with. The vessel is shared with CMA CGM and UASC.

Whilst this was an extreme example, even at more typical levels each call by an Ultra-Large Container Vessel (ULCV) can be expected to generate upwards of 5,000 teu of activity for a terminal [see image]. This peaking demands larger, more capable terminals than before, even if the annual throughput is no greater.

Alliances are also having a huge impact on terminals. At the Port of Antwerp for example, MSC alone accounts for a massive throughput of 4.5 million teu per annum, around half of the port’s container traffic. To this will soon be added the volumes of its P3 Alliance partners Maersk Line and CMA CGM, ideally all accommodated in one terminal.

The knock-on effects of bigger ships and alliances are already becoming apparent therefore. Numerous reshuffles of terminals both physically (in terms of layout and location) and in terms of ownership are being triggered. For example, in Antwerp, MSC has been given the go ahead to move its traffic from its terminal behind the locks to an enhanced riverside facility in the Deurganckdok. The move will see the redevelopment and expansion of the existing PSA terminal to create the MSC PSA European Terminal (MPET) with an initial capacity of more than seven million teu p.a. and able to play host to all three P3 carriers.

In Hong Kong, just a year after acquiring it from DP World and PSA, Hutchison’s HPH Trust has sold stakes in Asia Container Terminals (ACT) to Cosco Pacific (40%) and China Shipping Terminal Development (20%). ACT operates Container Terminal 8 West, located at Kwai Chung, Hong Kong, adjacent to HPH Trust’s existing container terminals HIT and Cosco-HIT. The acquisition has created common ownership of contiguous berths and will therefore help with berthing and handling larger ships.

Meanwhile in the US, last year saw the Port of Oakland facilitate the expansion of SSA Marine’s Oakland International Container Terminal, taking over the former APL and Hanjin terminals and creating a single, much larger terminal with a linear berthing line, able to accommodate bigger ships and greater volumes.

The formation and expansion of alliances has resulted in many carriers (or related terminal companies) having terminal interests which do not neatly correspond with those of their alliance partners. This is especially challenging on the USWC with its history of each carrier having its own terminal in each main port, but the complexity is also evident elsewhere, for example for the P3 Alliance in North Europe. Whilst each P3 carrier has a direct or indirect connection to a number of Benelux and German terminals, none of them coincide. Streamlining and unifying terminal facilities, ownership and usage by alliances is not a straightforward task therefore.

Besides the physical and commercial consolidation of terminals, another important trend is also evident. Global/international terminal operators (GTOs/ITOs), whilst competing strongly with each other in many places, are also increasingly opting to cooperate in selected locations.

APM Terminals (APMT) and MSC-affiliated Terminal Investment Limited (TIL) for example, now have joint ownership of terminals in Santos, Callao and Marseilles-Fos. In addition, the A.P. Moller-Maersk Group has signed a strategic cooperation MOU with China Shipping (Group) on container terminals. China Shipping Terminal Development, the terminals arm of the group, is said to be seeking to expand its European port network.

Meanwhile ICTSI has reached an agreement with CMA CGM (CMA Terminals) to sell it a 25% stake in its Lekki terminal. Lekki is a large greenfield port complex being developed 60 km east of Lagos, Nigeria. ICTSI has also made an agreement with PSA in Buenaventura, Colombia to jointly develop a new terminal. Originally this project was solely ICTSI as the international operator, and PSA has joined the deal. Neither company has said why PSA has taken a stake, other than that both companies share the same aspirations for the port, and that they would bring ‘complementary strengths’. Given the similar nature of both companies it is not clear what these are and perhaps the main purpose is that it allows the spreading of risk on the project.

The extent to which these various GTO/ITO collaborations are being driven by the increasing size of both ships and carrier alliances is not clear, but what is evident is that bigger ships and bigger alliances increase the challenges and risks for GTOs/ITOs. Greater cooperation is one way to mitigate this.

The growth in ship size and alliances means less ocean carrier product differentiation as far as shippers are concerned, who argue that container shipping is increasingly becoming ‘a commodity’. Container terminals though will retain their differentiation, despite their increasing size and greater homogenisation of ownership, due to factors such as service levels, infrastructure, location and inland connectivity. This should ensure that terminal operators are able to maintain their price levels, or indeed arguably increase them given the extra demands being placed on them by ocean carriers.

Drewry's View

Developments in ship size and alliances will continue to have far reaching ramifications for ports and terminals. More reshuffling and redevelopment of terminals can be expected, as can further selective cooperation between GTOs/ITOs.

Source: Drewry Maritime Research
www.drewry.co.uk/ciw



 

Maritime Reporter June 2015 Digital Edition
FREE Maritime Reporter Subscription
Latest Maritime News    rss feeds

People & Company News

Aberdeen Pupils Peek into Subsea Oil & Gas Technology

Pupils at an Aberdeen primary school were given a rare insight into the depths of the oil and gas industry’s subsea sector after getting to sit in the driving

AVEVA, DNV GL's Sesam Integration Cuts Cost

Integration of Aveva and DNV GL's Sesam Reduces Costs in Maritime and Offshore Engineering. Engineers designing ship hulls and offshore floaters can now save

FORAN for Pertamina's Future Ships

FORAN has been chosen by state-owned company PERTAMINA to review the design of their future oil product carrier ships, under construction in a shipyard with the FORAN System.

Ports

3D Printing in Rotterdam Port

Is 3D printing just a hype? Or is it really possible to print spare parts for ships that can actually withstand the requirements set for the often "rough" working

Caltex Replaces Australian Crew

The 36 Australian crew members of an Caltex tanker refusing to set sail after they were told their jobs would be gone after the next run. MR tanker Alexander Spirit (40,

Mombasa Port Workers End Strike

Mombasa, Kenya port workers end strike and returned to work on Friday after being warned they could lose their jobs, reports Reuters.   However the members of

Container Ships

Record Bulk Shipping Demolition Rates in 1H15

Monthly demolition rates in the dry bulk shipping sector averaged 3.3 million DWT for 1H15, according to new figures from BIMCO, compared to 1.3 million DWT last year.

Is It Too Late To Tangle With Spike in Shipping Market

A series of interesting and extreme price spikes is going on in the shipping market today, says Clarksons, provider of global shipping and offshore market intelligence.

Greek Shipping Mulls Cyprus Move

Greek shipping companies are looking into moving to Cyprus due to the instability and uncertainty in Greece, it emerged, reports Cyprus News Agency.   The director

Logistics

Grimaldi Orders Three PCTCs

After signing an order for the construction of five new ships two weeks ago, the Italian shipowner  Grimaldi Group has signed another contract for the construction

Is It Too Late To Tangle With Spike in Shipping Market

A series of interesting and extreme price spikes is going on in the shipping market today, says Clarksons, provider of global shipping and offshore market intelligence.

NITC Claims World's Largest Supertanker Fleet

According to the head of the National Iranian Tanker Company (NITC), Iran has 42 very large crude carriers or VLCCs, each able to carry 2 million barrels of oil, reports Press TV.

Consulting

New Record Year in Dry Bulk Demolition Underway - BIMCO

The monthly average for the first six months in 2015 is 3.3m DWT. In 2014 the first half year averaged at 1.33m DWT per month.   April 2015 saw 5.36 million DWT being retired from active service,

BMT Awarded Port Geographe Coastal Engineering Contract

BMT JFA Consultants (BMT), a subsidiary of BMT Group,  has been awarded a contract by the Western Australian Department of Transport (DoT) to provide services as

Beier Radio is now Beier Integrated Systems

For 70 years, Beier Radio has provided engineering, sales, and service for marine electronics around the globe. As the corporation marks its 70th anniversary,

 
 
Maritime Contracts Naval Architecture Navigation Pipelines Pod Propulsion Port Authority Salvage Ship Electronics Ship Repair Ship Simulators
rss | archive | history | articles | privacy | contributors | top maritime news | about us | copyright | maritime magazines
maritime security news | shipbuilding news | maritime industry | shipping news | maritime reporting | workboats news | ship design | maritime business

Time taken: 0.2182 sec (5 req/sec)