“It’s the steel production, stupid!”

Maritime Activity Reports, Inc.

April 17, 2019

  • Peter Sand, BIMCO
  • File Image: AdobeStock / © LucasZ z
  • Peter Sand, BIMCO Peter Sand, BIMCO
  • File Image: AdobeStock / © LucasZ z File Image: AdobeStock / © LucasZ z

BIMCO's Peter Sand, in a new report, weighs in on the implications for the Dry Bulk sectors.

Chinese imports of iron ore keep falling, while its crude steel production keeps growing. China’s increased use of scrap metal for its production of crude steel is fundamentally critical to the dry bulk shipping industry. Mostly Capesize ships are impacted by this, way beyond the temporary iron ore export disruptions in Brazil and Australia.

Chinese steel production grew by a massive 12.6 million tonnes (+9.2%) in the first two months on 2019 as estimated by China Iron and Steel Association (CISA). During the same period, Chinese imports of the paramount steel production ingredient, iron ore, fell by 5.6%, or 10.3 million tonnes. All numbers compared to the same period of 2018.

“For two decades the dry bulk shipping industry have relied on growth in Chinese steel production to continuously spur seaborne imports of high-quality iron ore – from Australia and Brazil.
That trend has now vanished and the Capesize ships operating on the spot market feel the pain. Growth in volumes are gone and iron ore is increasingly being shipped on long term contracts,” says Peter Sand, BIMCO’s Chief Shipping Analyst and continues:

“The 10.3 million tonnes fall in Chinese iron ore imports is equal to 57 Capesize loads (180,000 tonnes) fewer for the first two months of 2019 only. If that’s the pace we will see for the full year, we are in for a tough time.”

Watch out for scrap metal – instead of substitution of low-quality ore
It’s no longer only a matter of squeezing out low-quality domestically mined iron ore from the list of ingredients to grow Chinese imports. The focus area of the past 5-10 years is changing. It has become secondary to the rapidly increasing use of scrap steel. This development is a very illustrative example of the potential negative impact the circular economy will have on shipping.

Changes to the Chinese steel-making industry have pushed a move towards increased use of scrap metal, away from using imported and domestically mined iron ore blend into a solid amount of coking coal. China’s seaborne imports of coking coal fell by 11.2% (4.9 million tonnes) in 2018, with the slide continuing into 2019. Chinese coking coal imports are down by 16% in Jan-Feb 2019 from the same period in 2018.

“This year, BIMCO is putting special focus on this decoupling between steel production and iron ore imports, as the mega driver for Capesize transportation demand may not only disappoint, but worsen its fate,” says Peter Sand.

Keep an eye on China, as the rest of the world is fading
While India has now surpassed Japan as the world’s second largest steel producer – it produced only 12% of what China did in Jan-Feb 2019. Indian crude steel production grew by only 22,000 tonnes (+0.1%) in Jan-Feb 2019, according to the World Steel Association. In 2018, China produced 52% of all crude steel. Putting the significance of China further into context, global crude steel production excluding China, fell by 1.5% (-2.2 million tonnes) in the first two months of 2019.

Disrupted production and exports of iron ore in Brazil …
Issues and disruptions which are unlikely to go away soon. The full extent of the damage will only be fully known later. Reports from Vale on changed iron ore sales guidance for 2019 have not been clear cut. BIMCO expects that iron ore exports in 2019 from Brazil will fall short of those seen in 2018, as exports from stockpiles may not fully compensate for the lost production. Brazilian iron ore exports dropped to a multi-year low in March 2019 as 22.2 million tonnes were exported, down from 30 million tonnes in March 2018.

… and in Australia
Less than two months after the Dam I collapse; Australian exports were disrupted by the tropical cyclone Veronica (TC Veronica). Ports on the Pilbara coast in Western Australia were shut down from 22 March 2019 for a duration of 92-132 hours. This was the longest closure at Port Hedland, the key export hub, for many years.
Port Hedland handled 198 ships with iron ore cargoes in March 2019, down from 228 ships in March 2018. Shipments to all destinations fell by 13.5% or 5.7 million tonnes from March 2018, and iron ore exports also fell from February 2019 by 7%, or 2.95 million tonnes.

“Exports during April from the Pilbara coast ports will be affected to some degree in the aftermath of TC Veronica due to the damage done, including flooding,” says Peter Sand.

Baltic Capesize Index hits a record low falling by 95%– the USD per day average of the 5 T/C didn’t
How can that be? Isn’t the BCI simply the index value of the “average of the 5 time charter (T/C) routes for Baltic Capesize Index”? No, it’s not. The BCI is compiled from 11 routes in total: the 5 T/C routes and 6 “dollar per tonnes” routes. The T/C routes account for 50% of the BCI with the dollar per tonnes routes accounting for the other half. Most relevant in this context is the fact that Brazil-related trade has a higher weight in BCI than in the average for the 5 T/C routes.

Demand was already falling, and the Brazilian dam disaster only made things worse. Any upbeat sentiment left from 2018 that had kept rates around USD 15,000 per day in January evaporated instantly. From 25 January to 2 April, Baltic Capesize Index (BCI) fell by 95% from 1,730 to 92.

From 25 January to 2 April, the average of the 5 T/C routes for Baltic Capesize Index (USD per day) fell by 74% from USD 13,288 per day to USD 3,460 per day. Comparing the BCI and the actual rates, it looks like the BCI tends to exaggerate the actual development. When the 6 “dollar per tonnes” routes over the same period of time, from 25 January to 2 April, fell between 27% and 45%.

Why is it that the BCI has a much higher volatility than any of its components? And why is it falling by 95% - when nothing else is? Is it because volatility is endeavoured in an FFA market? Bottomline is that, freight rates are low in the Capesize market right now – but freight rates did not drop to 1/20 of what they were on 25 January over the course of the following 9½ weeks.
Since freight rates for Brazilian exports have been particularly depressed since the Brazilian dam collapse in January – the BCI has fallen dramatically. As Brazilian exports weigh more in the BCI than they do in the average of the 5 T/C routes – a gap between the two has opened.

Looking forward, iron ore will no longer drive the Capesize market up as it has been doing for two decades. Freight rates will become more negatively impacted by fleet growth than before, as demand is now falling, for the all-important Capesize commodity. This year alone, 13 Capesize ships have been demolished, while 12 have been delivered including five Valemax. Over the past 12 months – the Capesize fleet has grown by 2.8%. If iron ore demand from China stalls or outright falls going forward – then the fleet size must stall or fall – simply to keep the market balance from getting worse”, says Peter Sand.

Maritime Reporter Magazine Cover Oct 2019 - Marine Design Annual

Maritime Reporter and Engineering News’ first edition was published in New York City in 1883 and became our flagship publication in 1939. It is the world’s largest audited circulation magazine serving the global maritime industry, delivering more insightful editorial and news to more industry decision makers than any other source.

Maritime Reporter E-News subscription

Maritime Reporter E-News is the maritime industry's largest circulation and most authoritative ENews Service, delivered to your Email three times per week

Subscribe for Maritime Reporter E-News